cameron314 added a comment. There's dozens of places that take the API mutex without taking the process mutex. Take `Kill` for example: It needs to take the API mutex, but cannot take the run lock since it will be taken by the private state thread. Another example is `HandleCommand`, which takes the API mutex but has no process that it could ask to lock the API mutex for it.
On the flip side, all the `SBFrame` methods lock the process run lock but not the API mutex. And so on. I just really don't think this can be refactored in a useful way without rewriting the way all SB locks are taken, which is almost impossible to do at this point. Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D53412/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D53412 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
