clayborg added a comment. In D53412#1446252 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D53412#1446252>, @cameron314 wrote:
> @clayborg, I'm not sure how that would work. There's many places that lock > the process run lock without locking the target API mutex, and vice versa. Add an argument to the ProcessLocker constructor maybe? Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D53412/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D53412 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
