labath added a comment.
This looks fine to me. The test is a bit more coarse-grained than I'd like,
though I can't think of a substantially better approach right now. One of the
pdb folks should ok this too.
================
Comment at: source/Plugins/Process/minidump/ProcessMinidump.cpp:386
- for (lldb::tid_t tid = 0; tid < num_threads; ++tid) {
+ for (lldb::tid_t t_index = 0; t_index < num_threads; ++t_index) {
llvm::ArrayRef<uint8_t> context;
----------------
Since you're changing this, you might as well change the type to something more
appropriate (size_t?).
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55142/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55142
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
