clayborg added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D47992#1134120, @apolyakov wrote:
> If you look at `bool CMICmdCmdExecContinue::Execute()`, you'll see that there > are cases in which we need a flexible way to finish MI command(specific > action in error case for example). We have a few options: not to add such an > utility function, add and use it in simple situations where we just want to > check on SBError status or we may create utility function with lambda > functions in which user could specify actions he needs. What are your > thoughts about this? I am just trying to reduce duplicated code with my suggestion. Feel free to code normally when you are doing tricky things for returning in the middle of a function with special error cases. https://reviews.llvm.org/D47992 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
