Yea, that would do the trick.
On 7 March 2017 at 14:47, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > I think i can address this by adding a bool to llvm::sys::fs::status which > indicates whether to follow symlinks > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 5:41 AM Pavel Labath via Phabricator > <revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> labath added a comment. >> >> Zachary, unfortunately I had to revert this -- while investigating the >> breakages I've found a problem I don't think any of us realised -- llvm's >> statting code is based on stat(2), while lldb uses lstat(2). I think we need >> to go back and re-audit each case to see whether the behavior difference is >> a problem. In most of the cases, I think using stat would make things >> simpler (no need to special case symlink as a file type), but at least one >> case (SymbolFileDWARF) really depends on the lstat behavior (not resolving >> symlinks), so we need to figure out how to handle that. >> >> >> Repository: >> rL LLVM >> >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D30624 >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
