I think i can address this by adding a bool to llvm::sys::fs::status which indicates whether to follow symlinks On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 5:41 AM Pavel Labath via Phabricator < revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote:
> labath added a comment. > > Zachary, unfortunately I had to revert this -- while investigating the > breakages I've found a problem I don't think any of us realised -- llvm's > statting code is based on stat(2), while lldb uses lstat(2). I think we > need to go back and re-audit each case to see whether the behavior > difference is a problem. In most of the cases, I think using stat would > make things simpler (no need to special case symlink as a file type), but > at least one case (SymbolFileDWARF) really depends on the lstat behavior > (not resolving symlinks), so we need to figure out how to handle that. > > > Repository: > rL LLVM > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D30624 > > > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
