================
@@ -353,6 +353,8 @@ static const ArchDefinitionEntry g_macho_arch_entries[] = {
{ArchSpec::eCore_x86_64_x86_64, llvm::MachO::CPU_TYPE_X86_64,
llvm::MachO::CPU_SUBTYPE_X86_ARCH1, UINT32_MAX, SUBTYPE_MASK},
{ArchSpec::eCore_x86_64_x86_64h, llvm::MachO::CPU_TYPE_X86_64,
llvm::MachO::CPU_SUBTYPE_X86_64_H, UINT32_MAX, SUBTYPE_MASK},
{ArchSpec::eCore_x86_64_x86_64, llvm::MachO::CPU_TYPE_X86_64,
CPU_ANY, UINT32_MAX, UINT32_MAX},
+ {ArchSpec::eCore_riscv32, llvm::MachO::CPU_TYPE_RISCV,
llvm::MachO::CPU_SUBTYPE_RISCV_ALL, UINT32_MAX, SUBTYPE_MASK},
----------------
DavidSpickett wrote:
Oh so this is just how it's been named? If you're matching what the MachO spec
(whatever form it is) then that's fine, too late to change it now.
And I take from that that at some point a riscv64 value could be allocated for
MachO but there is not one at the moment.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136785
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits