================
@@ -232,4 +263,105 @@ Interpreter::Visit(const IdentifierNode *node) {
return identifier;
}
-} // namespace lldb_private::dil
+llvm::Expected<lldb::ValueObjectSP>
+Interpreter::Visit(const UnaryOpNode *node) {
+ FlowAnalysis rhs_flow(
+ /* address_of_is_pending */ node->kind() == UnaryOpKind::AddrOf);
+
+ Status error;
+ auto rhs_or_err = EvaluateNode(node->rhs(), &rhs_flow);
+ if (!rhs_or_err) {
+ return rhs_or_err;
+ }
+ lldb::ValueObjectSP rhs = *rhs_or_err;
+
+ CompilerType rhs_type = rhs->GetCompilerType();
+ switch (node->kind()) {
+ case UnaryOpKind::Deref: {
+ if (rhs_type.IsArrayType())
+ rhs = ArrayToPointerConversion(rhs, m_exe_ctx_scope);
+
+ lldb::ValueObjectSP dynamic_rhs = rhs->GetDynamicValue(m_default_dynamic);
+ if (dynamic_rhs)
+ rhs = dynamic_rhs;
+
+ if (rhs->GetCompilerType().IsPointerType()) {
+ if (rhs->GetCompilerType().IsPointerToVoid()) {
+ return llvm::make_error<DILDiagnosticError>(
+ m_expr, "indirection not permitted on operand of type 'void *'",
+ node->GetLocation(), 1);
+ }
+ return EvaluateDereference(rhs);
+ }
+ lldb::ValueObjectSP child_sp = rhs->Dereference(error);
+ if (error.Success())
+ rhs = child_sp;
+
+ return rhs;
+ }
+ case UnaryOpKind::AddrOf: {
+ if (node->rhs()->is_rvalue()) {
----------------
kuilpd wrote:
>From what I could gather, the first one is `ValueObject::AddressOf` that
>creates a `ValueObjectConstResult` and fills in its address. The second one
>calls `ValueObjectConstResultImpl::AddressOf` that also creates
>`ValueObjectConstResult` but with no address this time (which makes sense for
>a const value), so the third one fails.
I'm guessing that the first `ValueObjectConstResult` is pretty much an
implementation of a reference, so it has to have an address behind it so it can
be dereferenced normally.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134428
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
