werat wrote: > I'm sure lldb-eval had its reasons to implement this, but its use case was > very different from this, and it wasn't in a position to change lldb to make > things faster. We are.
As far as I remember flow analysis was implemented because according to C rules `&*p` is equivalent to `p`, which is important if `p` is NULL or "invalid". Same goes for array dereferencing. I could see how DIL may not want to care about this and just do dereference and return error if the pointer is invalid. I had to implement it in lldb-eval because we did have some user expressions that relied on this fact :) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134428 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
