Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On 7/31/10 10:51 AM, Drew Ames wrote:
>> Well, the current LiveCD uses XFCE and Seamonkey. Perhaps a new one
>> could do that too?
> 
> Yeah, like Jaqui said, Seamonkey fills the reqs all in one shot, which 
> is nice.
> 
> I'm not entirely sold on XFCE, however. One advantage is that we already 
> have it mostly working. There are alternatives, though.
> 
> William mentioned LXDE, which I've never tried, but it might be nice. 
> I've had a lot of fun with Enlightenment (DR17). And of course we could 
> go even simpler with something like fluxbox, which, actually, is what 
> the first few LiveCDs used.
> 
> How do you all feel our options for Desktop Environments fit in with 
> what we've already discussed?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jeremy
LXDE, lightweight, maybe. a win95/98 look and feel to it with the full 
feature set one would expect from such a d.e.

I actually like E16 better than E17, but again, that's personal 
preferences. :D

since LFS is as different as you can get from the more common distros, I 
suggest we seriously consider going with the least used U.I., 
Enlightenment. still easy to use, but an emphasis on the difference of 
GNU/Linux in general and LFS specifically just with the gui used.

Elive [ http://www.elivecd.org/ ] is a deb based livecd using E17.
[ to bad it requires payment to get the installer to work. ] Can anyone 
say OSX GUI on GNU/Linux? ;)
That was my first impression of the way they configured E17.
A reference distro to let people see what E17 can do without doing an 
install :)

oddly, fluxbox, blackbox and most of the rest of the gui systems have 
all been problems for me, in they don't even work to play with them :\ 
so I can't comment on them myself. [ I tend to use a mainstream distro 
and look at the options before going through a build process from 
sources, if a mainstream distro isn't giving me a working install, it 
doesn't really say much for the gui. ]
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/livecd
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to