Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:49:22 -0400 > Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Mark A. Greer wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 04:28:30PM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:03:12PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:53:51 -0700 >>>>> "Mark A. Greer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 12:41:57PM -0700, D'Abbraccio Joe-ljd015 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the advice, but I was just basing the list to post to on the >>>>>>> MAINTAINERS file which states that this is the one for Embedded PPC83XX. >>>>>>> If you still think that I should post to linuxppc-dev, let me know. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, I think it would be better to repost to linuxppc-dev. >>>>>> >>>>>> Does anyone have an objection to changing all of the: >>>>>> >>>>>> "L: [email protected]" >>>>>> >>>>>> in MAINTAINERS to: >>>>>> >>>>>> "L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" ?? >>>>>> >>>>>> Kumar, Josh, Vitaly, et. al.? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I personally don't care either way. I'm already subscribed to both >>>>> lists. >>>>> >>>>> Makes sense to go to linuxppc-dev given the arch/powerpc migration. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I thought the -embedded list was created in the first place to keep some >>>> of the "noise" off of -dev (i.e. "I can't get interface <foo> to work on >>>> my custom <embedded eval board>-lookalike board, HELP!"). If people still >>>> care about keeping that on a separate list, then we shouldn't change it. >>>> >>>> >>> Yes, IIRC, that was the reason but now with the merge and low volume on this >>> list, it makes sense to me to just get rid of -embedded. >>> >>> >>> >> Perhaps my perspective is unique, but I doubt it. I find it nice that >> this list is low volume and not filled with endless patches about CHRP >> and P series and open firmware syntax blah blah blah... >> >> No offense intended to all the people who are doing wonderful work >> expanding the Linux universe, but for your average dude or dudette >> working on embedded boards that happen to have a PowerPC processor, this >> list is a pretty good forum. >> > > I think the original thought was to have patches go to linuxppc-dev. > Not necessarily all discussion. > > josh > > True, and that makes sense. Patches should go where the right people will see them quickly. At least two people have advocated getting rid of the linuxppc-embedded list, though. Maybe I misunderstood.
regards, Ben _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
