On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:03:12PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:53:51 -0700 > "Mark A. Greer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 12:41:57PM -0700, D'Abbraccio Joe-ljd015 wrote: > > > Thanks for the advice, but I was just basing the list to post to on the > > > MAINTAINERS file which states that this is the one for Embedded PPC83XX. > > > If you still think that I should post to linuxppc-dev, let me know. > > > > Yes, I think it would be better to repost to linuxppc-dev. > > > > Does anyone have an objection to changing all of the: > > > > "L: [email protected]" > > > > in MAINTAINERS to: > > > > "L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" ?? > > > > Kumar, Josh, Vitaly, et. al.? > > I personally don't care either way. I'm already subscribed to both > lists. > > Makes sense to go to linuxppc-dev given the arch/powerpc migration.
I thought the -embedded list was created in the first place to keep some of the "noise" off of -dev (i.e. "I can't get interface <foo> to work on my custom <embedded eval board>-lookalike board, HELP!"). If people still care about keeping that on a separate list, then we shouldn't change it. I think the relevant people probably monitor this list (maybe not quite as frequently) to catch things. I even caught the first PWRficient-related question in a timely manner the other day. :-) Still, that being said, patches will clearly get better exposure on -dev, especially device tree crap. -Olof _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
