On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:49:22 -0400 Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark A. Greer wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 04:28:30PM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:03:12PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:53:51 -0700 > >>> "Mark A. Greer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 12:41:57PM -0700, D'Abbraccio Joe-ljd015 wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Thanks for the advice, but I was just basing the list to post to on the > >>>>> MAINTAINERS file which states that this is the one for Embedded PPC83XX. > >>>>> If you still think that I should post to linuxppc-dev, let me know. > >>>>> > >>>> Yes, I think it would be better to repost to linuxppc-dev. > >>>> > >>>> Does anyone have an objection to changing all of the: > >>>> > >>>> "L: [email protected]" > >>>> > >>>> in MAINTAINERS to: > >>>> > >>>> "L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" ?? > >>>> > >>>> Kumar, Josh, Vitaly, et. al.? > >>>> > >>> I personally don't care either way. I'm already subscribed to both > >>> lists. > >>> > >>> Makes sense to go to linuxppc-dev given the arch/powerpc migration. > >>> > >> I thought the -embedded list was created in the first place to keep some > >> of the "noise" off of -dev (i.e. "I can't get interface <foo> to work on > >> my custom <embedded eval board>-lookalike board, HELP!"). If people still > >> care about keeping that on a separate list, then we shouldn't change it. > >> > > > > Yes, IIRC, that was the reason but now with the merge and low volume on this > > list, it makes sense to me to just get rid of -embedded. > > > > > Perhaps my perspective is unique, but I doubt it. I find it nice that > this list is low volume and not filled with endless patches about CHRP > and P series and open firmware syntax blah blah blah... > > No offense intended to all the people who are doing wonderful work > expanding the Linux universe, but for your average dude or dudette > working on embedded boards that happen to have a PowerPC processor, this > list is a pretty good forum. I think the original thought was to have patches go to linuxppc-dev. Not necessarily all discussion. josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
