On 7/9/20 3:01 PM, Alistair Francis via Libc-alpha wrote: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 2:36 PM Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha > <libc-al...@sourceware.org> wrote: >> >> On 7/9/20 2:13 PM, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote: >>>> Rebased ARC port on master and fired a build-many-glibcs <glibcs> now >>>> (expect some >>>> abilist updates). Will do a full testsuite run >>> >>> No regressions in sysvipc tests ! >> >> But quite a few regressions. Baseline is ARC port off of upstream >> 81b1c8cbb5b4 >> "(hurd: Simplify usleep timeout computation)" and failures below seen in ARC >> port >> off of today's master ffd178c651b8 "(sysv: linux: Add 64-bit time_t variant >> for >> shmctl)" >> >> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic >> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic2 >> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic3 >> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic4 >> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic5 >> FAIL: elf/tst-libc_dlvsym >> FAIL: elf/tst-libc_dlvsym-static >> FAIL: elf/tst-single_threaded-static-dlopen >> FAIL: elf/tst-tls9-static > > I see the same recent-ish regressions for RV32. > > Alistair
Thx for confirming ! >> Could it be due to recent TLS optimizations... >> >> | $ cat dlfcn/tststatic.out >> | .../build/libc.so.6: cannot allocate memory in static TLS block >> _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
