On 09/07/2020 13:24, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 7/9/20 9:03 AM, Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/07/2020 16:32, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>>> On 7/8/20 9:31 AM, Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 07/07/2020 17:55, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Changes since v7.1:
>>>>> - Added a few more 32-bit time_t syscalls to fixup-asm-unistd.h
>>>>> and regen arch-syscall.h to remove them: __NR_timer{g,s}ettime,
>>>>> __NR_clock_{gettime,nanosleep,settime}
>>>>> - minimal/annotated list of 32-bit syscall aliases in ARC sysdeps.h
>>>>> for 64-bit time_t support
>>>>> - Open-coded SYS_ify() but retained the macro as used by common
>>>>> code
>>>>> - No functional changes in generated dsos.
>>>>> Changes since v7:
>>>>> - used long int (iso int) in sysdep.h/syscall_error for handling
>>>>> registers
>>>> LGTM, thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zane...@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> Thx a lot. I now have Reviewed-by tags on all ARC patches so we just need
>>> the
>>> sysvipc/semctl y2038 patches to hit upstream before I can commit.
>>
>> The patches are in, if you could just to a sanity check I will
>> be grateful.
>
> Thx.
>
> Rebased ARC port on master and fired a build-many-glibcs <glibcs> now (expect
> some
> abilist updates). Will do a full testsuite run and if thats same as before,
> I'm
> good to push ARC port ?
>
I think it should suffice, just to avoid some issue with recent
traffic on repository recently.
_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
