* Alistair Francis: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 8:55 AM Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha > <libc-al...@sourceware.org> wrote: >> >> On 7/10/20 2:28 AM, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote: >> > * Alistair Francis via Libc-alpha: >> > >> >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 2:36 PM Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha >> >> <libc-al...@sourceware.org> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> On 7/9/20 2:13 PM, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote: >> >>>>> Rebased ARC port on master and fired a build-many-glibcs <glibcs> now >> >>>>> (expect some >> >>>>> abilist updates). Will do a full testsuite run >> >>>> >> >>>> No regressions in sysvipc tests ! >> >>> >> >>> But quite a few regressions. Baseline is ARC port off of upstream >> >>> 81b1c8cbb5b4 >> >>> "(hurd: Simplify usleep timeout computation)" and failures below seen in >> >>> ARC port >> >>> off of today's master ffd178c651b8 "(sysv: linux: Add 64-bit time_t >> >>> variant for >> >>> shmctl)" >> >>> >> >>> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic >> >>> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic2 >> >>> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic3 >> >>> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic4 >> >>> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic5 >> >>> FAIL: elf/tst-libc_dlvsym >> >>> FAIL: elf/tst-libc_dlvsym-static >> >>> FAIL: elf/tst-single_threaded-static-dlopen >> >>> FAIL: elf/tst-tls9-static >> >> >> >> I see the same recent-ish regressions for RV32. >> > >> > Did you rebuild from scratch? After the libc.so/ld.so ABI changes that >> > went in recently, it could be the result of incomplete make >> > dependencies. >> >> From scratch meaning glibc alone or the whole toolchain. I used buildroot and >> glibc-dirclean to nuke entire glibc but gcc was not rebuilt. I can try that >> too. > > That's the same with me. The toolchain wasn't rebuilt but glibc was > built from a clean directory. I am rebuilding now with a rebuilt > toolchain. > >> >> Some of the failed tests have prints about static TLS block ... so I'm >> wondering >> if they could be related ? > > I see the same messages. > >> >> | $ cat dlfcn/tststatic.out >> | .../build/libc.so.6: cannot allocate memory in static TLS block > > That's what I see as well.
Sorry, my fault. I posted a patch that should fix static dlopen: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-July/116143.html> Would you mind testing it? Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
