On 2/23/26 22:43, Martin KaFai Lau wrote: > > On 2/11/26 2:02 AM, Michal Luczaj wrote: >>> It should also be helpful to be consistent with tcp/udp iter and use >>> lock_sock() instead of lock_sock_fast() in bpf_iter_unix_seq_show(). >> OK, I'll tweak that in v3. > > Hi, Michal. Are you planning to send v3 soon? I don't think the > sock_owned_by_user for the non-tracing prog needs to be addressed in the > same set.
Yes, I'm working on it. Sorry for the delay, I'm taking my sweet time to come up with a selftest. I think I can neatly fit the sock_owned_by_user()-related stuff in this series, but let me know if you'd rather have it separately. Whichever way, I don't mind.
