On 2/11/26 2:02 AM, Michal Luczaj wrote:
It should also be helpful to be consistent with tcp/udp iter and use lock_sock() instead of lock_sock_fast() in bpf_iter_unix_seq_show().OK, I'll tweak that in v3.
Hi, Michal. Are you planning to send v3 soon? I don't think the sock_owned_by_user for the non-tracing prog needs to be addressed in the same set.
