On 11/5/25 10:14 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 08:31:07PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> From: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]> >> >> The power requirements for the CDSP instances on SC8280XP aren't fully >> described, with only one of the three present. Fix that. >> >> Fixes: ee651cd1e944 ("dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: pas: Add sc8280xp adsp >> and nsp pair") >> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sc8280xp-pas.yaml | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git >> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sc8280xp-pas.yaml >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sc8280xp-pas.yaml >> index 96d53baf6e00..5dbda3a55047 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sc8280xp-pas.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sc8280xp-pas.yaml >> @@ -91,9 +91,13 @@ allOf: >> power-domains: >> items: >> - description: NSP power domain >> + - description: CX power domain >> + - description: MXC power domain >> power-domain-names: >> items: >> - const: nsp >> + - const: cx >> + - const: mxc > > Heh, so if this was described since beginning entire binding would fit > 100% into qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml, instead having this now in different > file because of different order. Not great. :(
Yeah I noticed the same.. It's probably not the last conversion like that which will need to happen either.. Konrad
