Sagi Shahar wrote:
[snip]
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/tdx/tdx_util.h
> b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/tdx/tdx_util.h
> index dafdc7e46abe..a2509959c7ce 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/tdx/tdx_util.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/tdx/tdx_util.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,60 @@ static inline bool is_tdx_vm(struct kvm_vm *vm)
> return vm->type == KVM_X86_TDX_VM;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * TDX ioctls
> + */
> +
> +#define __vm_tdx_vm_ioctl(vm, cmd, metadata, arg) \
NIT: Why not call 'metadata' -> 'flags'?
> +({ \
> + int r; \
> + \
> + union { \
> + struct kvm_tdx_cmd c; \
> + unsigned long raw; \
> + } tdx_cmd = { .c = { \
> + .id = (cmd), \
> + .flags = (uint32_t)(metadata), \
> + .data = (uint64_t)(arg), \
> + } }; \
> + \
> + r = __vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_OP, &tdx_cmd.raw); \
> + r ?: tdx_cmd.c.hw_error; \
> +})
I see this is a common pattern for kvm selftests but I'm struggling to
figure out why this is a macro and not a function call?
> +
> +#define vm_tdx_vm_ioctl(vm, cmd, flags, arg) \
> +({ \
> + int ret = __vm_tdx_vm_ioctl(vm, cmd, flags, arg); \
> + \
> + __TEST_ASSERT_VM_VCPU_IOCTL(!ret, #cmd, ret, vm); \
> +})
> +
> +#define __vm_tdx_vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, cmd, metadata, arg)
> \
NIT: Why not just call 'metadata', 'flags'?
> +({ \
> + int r; \
> + \
> + union { \
> + struct kvm_tdx_cmd c; \
> + unsigned long raw; \
> + } tdx_cmd = { .c = { \
> + .id = (cmd), \
> + .flags = (uint32_t)(metadata), \
> + .data = (uint64_t)(arg), \
> + } }; \
> + \
> + r = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_OP, &tdx_cmd.raw); \
> + r ?: tdx_cmd.c.hw_error; \
> +})
> +
[snip]
> +
> +static struct kvm_tdx_capabilities *tdx_read_capabilities(struct kvm_vm *vm)
> +{
> + struct kvm_tdx_capabilities *tdx_cap = NULL;
> + int nr_cpuid_configs = 4;
> + int rc = -1;
> + int i;
> +
> + do {
> + nr_cpuid_configs *= 2;
> +
> + tdx_cap = realloc(tdx_cap, sizeof(*tdx_cap) +
> + sizeof(tdx_cap->cpuid) +
> + (sizeof(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2) *
> nr_cpuid_configs));
> + TEST_ASSERT(tdx_cap,
> + "Could not allocate memory for tdx capability
> nr_cpuid_configs %d\n",
> + nr_cpuid_configs);
> +
> + tdx_cap->cpuid.nent = nr_cpuid_configs;
> + rc = __vm_tdx_vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_TDX_CAPABILITIES, 0, tdx_cap);
Why not use vm_tdx_vm_ioctl()?
Generally though it is good.
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <[email protected]>
[snip]