2014-09-30 13:52 GMT+02:00 Bert Belder <[email protected]>: > next iteration of libuv would only support one-shot timers with an API > similar to this: > `uv_timeout(uv_timeout_req_t* timeout, int64_t timeout, uv_timeout_cb > callback);
While that is great it also completely drops the "periodic timer" feature from libuv. Ok, current periodic timers are wrong but, should libuv provide correct periodic timers (those in which the callback execution time does not affect the next execution)? By just providing the uv_timeout() request, users cannot implement real periodic timers. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libuv" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libuv. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
