On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <[email protected]> wrote:
> timerfd would create a file descriptor per timer, that's one million fds
> if we have one million timers, vs 0 fds which the current implementation
> uses.

That's not strictly necessary.  Libuv could use a per-event loop
timerfd and multiplex timers on top of that.

There would be some system call overhead - an extra timerfd_settime()
call before some/most calls to epoll_wait() - but it's probably not
hugely expensive.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"libuv" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libuv.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to