2014-09-29 14:11 GMT+02:00 Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <[email protected]>: > I understand we could achieve sub-millisecond precision like that, > right? But it wouldn't "fix" the initial exposed problem here since we > still don't account for the duration of the callback... unless I missed > something :-)
AFAIK epoll/kqueue/etc is needed to be notified about timerfd events, right? If so we have the same issue since it may take some time since timerfd fires until libuv checks it (exactly the current callback(s) execution time). How to deal with it? -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libuv" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libuv. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
