On Wed, 17 Dec 2014, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote:
On 16/12/14 22:29, Martin Storsjö wrote:
Since this structurally is quite different from normal RTP
(multiple streams are muxed into one single mpegts stream,
which is packetized into one single RTP session), it is kept
as a separate muxer.
This is one out of two alternative ways of achieving the same.
This one is probably more straightforward, but requires using
a different muxer name.
Probably this approach is more maintainable and could be extended to
support other rtp encapsulation of formats (asf?) in a cleaner way.
I'd use this approach.
I like this approach too, makes things cleaner.
wrt the code, should we bump minor or patch version too?
Ah, yes, it probably should have a minor bump and a changelog entry as
well.
// Martin
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
