On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > On 16/12/14 22:29, Martin Storsjö wrote: >> Since this structurally is quite different from normal RTP >> (multiple streams are muxed into one single mpegts stream, >> which is packetized into one single RTP session), it is kept >> as a separate muxer. >> >> This is one out of two alternative ways of achieving the same. >> This one is probably more straightforward, but requires using >> a different muxer name. > > Probably this approach is more maintainable and could be extended to > support other rtp encapsulation of formats (asf?) in a cleaner way. > > I'd use this approach.
I like this approach too, makes things cleaner. wrt the code, should we bump minor or patch version too? -- Vittorio _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
