On 16/12/14 22:29, Martin Storsjö wrote: > Since this structurally is quite different from normal RTP > (multiple streams are muxed into one single mpegts stream, > which is packetized into one single RTP session), it is kept > as a separate muxer. > > This is one out of two alternative ways of achieving the same. > This one is probably more straightforward, but requires using > a different muxer name.
Probably this approach is more maintainable and could be extended to support other rtp encapsulation of formats (asf?) in a cleaner way. I'd use this approach. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
