On 2014-01-13 16:33:43 +0200, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2014, Janne Grunau wrote:
> 
> > Ported from ARMv7 NEON.
> > ---
> > libavcodec/aarch64/h264dsp_init_aarch64.c |  25 +++
> > libavcodec/aarch64/h264dsp_neon.S         | 266 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 291 insertions(+)
> 
> > diff --git a/libavcodec/aarch64/h264dsp_neon.S 
> > b/libavcodec/aarch64/h264dsp_neon.S
> > index 777ac01..2c47f21 100644
> > --- a/libavcodec/aarch64/h264dsp_neon.S
> > +++ b/libavcodec/aarch64/h264dsp_neon.S
> > @@ -259,3 +259,269 @@ function ff_h264_h_loop_filter_chroma_neon, export=1
> >
> >         ret
> > endfunc
> > +
> > +.macro  biweight_16     macs, macd
> > +        dup             v0.16B,  w5
> > +        dup             v1.16B,  w6
> > +        mov             v4.16B,  v16.16B
> > +        mov             v6.16B,  v16.16B
> > +1:      subs            w3,  w3,  #2
> > +        ld1             {v20.16B}, [x0], x2
> > +        \macd           v4.8H,   v0.8B,  v20.8B
> > +        //pld             [r0]
> > +        \macd\()2       v6.8H,   v0.16B, v20.16B
> > +        ld1             {v22.16B}, [x1], x2
> > +        \macs           v4.8H,   v1.8B,  v22.8B
> > +        //pld             [r1]
> 
> This looks like leftovers - any plan to either strip them out or use 
> prfm?

yes, leftover, forgot to change them to prfm and test

> > +
> > +/*
> > +void ff_biweight_h264_pixels_16_neon(uint8_t *dst, uint8_t *src, int 
> > stride,
> > +                                     int height, int log2_den, int weightd,
> > +                                     int weights, int offset);
> > +*/
> > +.macro  biweight_func   w
> 
> gas-preprocessor can't strip out these multiline comments, right? This 
> might probably work just fine here, but in general gas-pp kinda relies 
> on the fact that the comments are stripped out originally. Some of the 
> function prototypes in the existing arm asm source make gas-pp misbehave 
> when they use the word 'const' which is also a macro, unless these 
> comments are stripped out early.

It builds fine otherwise I would have remembered to remove them after
the function was working as expected.

Janne
> 
> // Martin
> _______________________________________________
> libav-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to