On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:47:53AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:44:53PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: > >> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > >> > >> > None of the compiled binaries use any of libpostproc's symbols except > >> > for trivial ones that print version information. Thus the dependency > >> > yields no benefit and it is preferable to drop it. > >> > --- > >> > Makefile | 6 ++++-- > >> > cmdutils.c | 2 -- > >> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >> > >> [...] > >> > >> > +SUBDIRS-$(CONFIG_POSTPROC) += postproc > >> > +SUBDIRS = $(SUBDIRS-yes) $(FFLIBS) > >> > >> This part feels a little weird. > > > > Do you have another suggestion? We use the -yes trick everywhere... > > That wasn't what I meant.
You are speaking in riddles. It's unavoidable to work with two lists, since the list of libraries to link against is not identical to the list of libraries to install. Since the list of install libraries is a superset of the link libraries, it makes sense to me to construct the former out of the latter. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
