On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 06:12:53PM -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > On 5/25/17 6:03 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > Uploaded in r1398, my eyes (looking at firefox) can't tell the > > difference. Maybe I've borked it. > > > > Oh well, at last I've found something *worse* for editing than the > > perl modules xml in BLFS. > > Looks like you fixed it. It probably looks exactly the same as before. > Browsers can often render HTML well enough even when there are missing > elements, but I think the idea was that it was breaking the parsing of > Julien's scripts. Hopefully that's corrected now. > > And yeah, I agree, manually editing any kind of XML or HTML is no fun. > > JH
OK, thanks to both you and akh. But I'm lost in a maze of faq html files, all sufficently alike to cause confusion. ĸen -- I live in a city. I know sparrows from starlings. After that everything is a duck as far as I'm concerned. -- Monstrous Regiment -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
