On 5/25/17 6:03 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
Uploaded in r1398, my eyes (looking at firefox) can't tell the
difference. Maybe I've borked it.
Oh well, at last I've found something *worse* for editing than the
perl modules xml in BLFS.
Looks like you fixed it. It probably looks exactly the same as before.
Browsers can often render HTML well enough even when there are missing
elements, but I think the idea was that it was breaking the parsing of
Julien's scripts. Hopefully that's corrected now.
And yeah, I agree, manually editing any kind of XML or HTML is no fun.
JH
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
