Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > No, sorry, I don't. In the comments of that bug report the dev suggests > using sysroot for pass 1 of gcc.
Yeah, and he also says create $sysroot/usr/include. If you're going to hang your hat on the word of 1 junior GCC dev... > Also, haven't you noticed that making use of sysroot in pass one > eliminates the scenario that is causing you trouble in pass 2, thereby > removing the need for the patch? Huh? Not at all. Please, JH, explain how this is so. And like I said earlier, the patch is already gone in my dev build - no sysroot in sight. Regards Greg -- http://www.diy-linux.org/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
