Ryan Oliver wrote: > Look back into the clfs-lite that was proposed 4 years ago in the lfs wiki. > > Referenced here > http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2005-April/051171.html
Vapour. > 4 years ago your opinion was markedly different with regards to using > cross-compilers for any part of the lfs toolchain. Yes. This is true. But I now leverage cross compilation where it's actually useful. > You entirely miss the point of cross-lfs Nobody here wants to bootstrap from Solaris. >> if (*cross_compile == '0' || target_system_root) >> >> ie: if native build or sysrooted build >> > > *HEH* > > Man you cant even understand simple code... and here I am having > technical arguments with you... You are posting late at night. This probably explains your confusion and ranting. I'll try to say it again in different words so you can understand. - The paths inside that conditional block take effect when a native compiler. - The paths inside that conditional block take effect when a sysrooted compiler (cross or not cross). Now, who is it that doesn't understand the code? > Remember, for a sysrooted cross-compiler cross_compile == 1 AND > target_system_root *IS* defined Yes, which means the above referenced block of code will take effect because it's a sysrooted compiler. Get it? Please also keep in mind a sysrooted compiler doesn't have to be cross! <Remainder of embarrassing drivel deleted> Now. Let's all sit back, and enjoy the show while you explain your way out of this one! Regards Greg -- http://www.diy-linux.org/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
