I found many repetitions in the same file. There are repetitions across the modules too.
With Warm Regards V.Kadal Amutham 919444360480 914422396480 On 14 June 2013 13:31, Andre Fischer <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14.06.2013 04:19, Kadal Amutham wrote: > > Regarding your earlier question regarding why the same string may be > defined more than once. I am not sure that if that is the original > question but if it is, here is my attempt at an answer: > Different modules in AOO, for example sw for Writer and sc for Calc, can > not easily access resource files from other modules. In some cases you can > try to move such strings to a common base module such as svx. But that is > not always possible and involves some work. > > In other words, there are technical reasons for duplicate strings as well > as lack of time and laziness. > > Hopefully this is outdated, but in any case Tamil would be the only >> affected language and we will remember to check it. >> >> >> We will take this issue after the release and all of us become a bit free >> >> With Warm Regards >> >> V.Kadal Amutham >> 919444360480 >> 914422396480 >> >> >> On 14 June 2013 00:56, Andrea Pescetti <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Kadal Amutham wrote: >>> >>> [Juan C. Sanz] "According with Tips for translators, tip 3 in [1] >>>> "OpenOffice will >>>> >>>> automatically assign an accelerator to commands". That is, as far as I >>>> can >>>> understand, that your translation will do have accelerators. I hope you >>>> can >>>> confirm us that." >>>> I was specifically told in some thread, not to use the accelerators. >>>> >>>> This is correct. No need to specify accelerators. Honestly, I have a >>> doubt >>> for Kadal only, since the algorithm, from very old documentation >>> (pre-OpenOffice 1.0!), seems to apply to Latin languages only: >>> http://wiki.openoffice.org/****wiki/Mnemonics_Localisation#**<http://wiki.openoffice.org/**wiki/Mnemonics_Localisation#**> >>> How_the_mnemonics_are_**assigned<http://wiki.** >>> openoffice.org/wiki/Mnemonics_**Localisation#How_the_** >>> mnemonics_are_assigned<http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Mnemonics_Localisation#How_the_mnemonics_are_assigned> >>> > >>> >> > Is this "no accelerators" rule still active? Even in languages where > automatic selection of accelerators work, can that not break documentation? > I mean, can adding a new string lead to all accelerators being redefined? > > And there is point 3 in section 1.1 in the Mnemonics_Localisation page > mentioned above: > > "The bugs are fixed manually in Web-LingTool by placing the '~' > character to a different position" > > Removing all explicitly defined accelerators would remove such bug fixes. > > -Andre > > >>> Hopefully this is outdated, but in any case Tamil would be the only >>> affected language and we will remember to check it. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Andrea. >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------****----------------------------** >>> --**--------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>> l10n-unsubscribe@openoffice.****apache.org<http://apache.org> >>> <l10n-unsubscribe@**openoffice.apache.org<[email protected]> >>> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected].****org< >>> l10n-help@openoffice.**apache.org <[email protected]>> >>> >>> >>> > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > l10n-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org<[email protected]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > [email protected].**org<[email protected]> > >
