> On Jan. 25, 2016, 11:55 vorm., Alvaro Soliverez wrote:
> > Also, have Allan's concerns regarding the use of these calls by other 
> > modules been addressed?

Not yet. I think I checked that before I wrote the GCI task. Unfortunately I'll 
be unable to do so again until next week. We can leave the request in the queue 
until that issue is solved.


- Christian


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126875/#review91575
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 24, 2016, 11:07 nachm., Artur Puzio wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126875/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 24, 2016, 11:07 nachm.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KMymoney and Christian David.
> 
> 
> Repository: kmymoney
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Moved the question from `TransactionMatcher::match` to 
> `MyMoneyStatementReader::askUserToEnterScheduleForMatching`.
> Added `MyMoneyTransaction & importedTransaction` parmeter to 
> `MyMoneyStatementReader::askUserToEnterScheduleForMatching`, as 
> `importedTransation` is required to calculate if the question from 
> `TransactionMatcher::match` should be shown.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   kmymoney/converter/mymoneystatementreader.h 80da202 
>   kmymoney/converter/mymoneystatementreader.cpp 1634bbb 
>   kmymoney/dialogs/transactionmatcher.cpp 7d97404 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126875/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Automated tests still pass, but they don't check the subject of work.
> Screenshot: [link](https://imgur.com/3Veh70N)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Artur Puzio
> 
>

Reply via email to