Le mardi 2 juillet 2013 21:35:13 Mark a écrit : > ** ahh, so we're continuing in this message after all instead of "KIO > progress towards tier 1 framework? (resend)". **
No, this was a reply to your message on k-f-d. I just removed the "resend" in my reply, it didn't make sense for the reply. > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:06 PM, David Faure <fa...@kde.org> wrote: > > The current status is that I'm making a delegate factory so that kio jobs > > don't instanciate their own delegates directly (which kills core/gui > > separation). After that we should be able to move much more stuff to > > kiocore (like the actual jobs, and the scheduler). > > Do you have any schedule? As in the items to do for kio, the progress > who is doing what, the grand KIO plan? Is there a wiki page with this > just like the frameworks splitting page? Not yet, because it's very linear. Nothing that can be parallelized at this point. > which tier is KJob going to be anyway? It's not listed in the > frameworks splitting document. KJob is part of kcoreaddons, tier1. > Well, for linux it compiles just fine. I tried that a few days ago > (last sunday). The thing i got complaints about is undefined reference > to QSaveFile in the libkio library (not kiocore). But i have yet to > look into that in more detail. And yes, that is with Qt 5.2 dev > branch. Strange. Maybe a missing linking to Qt5::Core... (which doesn't show up when building all of kdelibs, for sure). > Other then that, i will try to give you feedback when building > kiocore on mac. I wonder how far that will go considering the ... the ? (truncated sentence) -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5 _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
