> [: Kevin Ottens :] > Note that apparently there's no interest from the maintainer in making > ki18n tier1 (ktranscript plugin being part of it and depending on kjs)... > Which would make KIO tier3. You might want either to discuss with > Chusslove or consider using tr() I'm afraid.
In the case of JavaScript interpreter, ki18n can either depend on QtScript or on KJS; either way that is one dependency extra, and I'd rather stick with KJS. This is because I don't like the drama with JavaScript engines, in which Qt must participate, while KJS can remain its "boring self". I consider this outweighing the advantage of a tier 1 label. Then, ki18n should also begin to depend on a locale and on a config provider, and to me it is still unclear which these will be. -- Chusslove Illich (Часлав Илић)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
