Chusslove Illich wrote: >> [: Kevin Ottens :] >> Note that apparently there's no interest from the maintainer in making >> ki18n tier1 (ktranscript plugin being part of it and depending on kjs)... >> Which would make KIO tier3. You might want either to discuss with >> Chusslove or consider using tr() I'm afraid. > > In the case of JavaScript interpreter, ki18n can either depend on QtScript > or on KJS; either way that is one dependency extra, and I'd rather stick > with KJS. This is because I don't like the drama with JavaScript engines, > in which Qt must participate, while KJS can remain its "boring self". > I consider this outweighing the advantage of a tier 1 label.
As far as I understand, the ki18n library does not depend on a javascript engine, but only the separate ktranscript plugin does? Note that QtScript can't be loaded in a plugin, so using it in KTranscript relies on that changing anyway: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38193 Thanks, Steve. _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
