----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109551/#review32130 -----------------------------------------------------------
Martin, any news about that patch? Or we still have no clue why it introduce a regression? - Kevin Ottens On March 18, 2013, 7:54 p.m., Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109551/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 18, 2013, 7:54 p.m.) > > > Review request for KDE Frameworks, kdelibs, David Faure, and Oswald > Buddenhagen. > > > Description > ------- > > Just a simple port of KPtyProcess away from using KProcess. > > > Diffs > ----- > > kpty/kptyprocess.h 5e0df96 > kpty/kptyprocess.cpp 015a58c > kpty/tests/kptyprocesstest.cpp 04990a0 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109551/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > builds and tests pass. > > > Thanks, > > Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark > >
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
