> On March 18, 2013, 10:04 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > kpty/tests/kptyprocesstest.cpp, line 193 > > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109551/diff/2/?file=120310#file120310line193> > > > > i don't think eating the sleep is a good idea. i'm sure i added it for > > a reason (in a previous life ^^).
with the sleep the test fails, and even with high load I can't get the test to fail without it. > On March 18, 2013, 10:04 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > kpty/tests/kptyprocesstest.cpp, line 208 > > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109551/diff/2/?file=120310#file120310line208> > > > > because it's completely broken ^^ having looked at QProcess and KProcess and KPtyDevice I still don't understand what is broken... > On March 18, 2013, 10:04 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > kpty/tests/kptyprocesstest.cpp, line 210 > > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109551/diff/2/?file=120310#file120310line210> > > > > the -c needs to be a separate argument. > > > > the quotes, backslashes and attempt at a newline are all garbage. I first had -c as a separate argument, and it didn't matter. And I had to add an extra newline to get it to work with doing it manually. - Martin Tobias Holmedahl ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109551/#review29478 ----------------------------------------------------------- On March 18, 2013, 7:54 p.m., Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109551/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 18, 2013, 7:54 p.m.) > > > Review request for KDE Frameworks, kdelibs, David Faure, and Oswald > Buddenhagen. > > > Description > ------- > > Just a simple port of KPtyProcess away from using KProcess. > > > Diffs > ----- > > kpty/kptyprocess.h 5e0df96 > kpty/kptyprocess.cpp 015a58c > kpty/tests/kptyprocesstest.cpp 04990a0 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109551/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > builds and tests pass. > > > Thanks, > > Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark > >
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel