https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383421
--- Comment #31 from hotmusic...@mail.bg --- (In reply to andreas from comment #23) > I'm not sure if the header is right? make breeze more distinctiv or do you > mean make oxygen fit plasma 5. maybe I also wrote in a way that was not > friendly. sorry. > > two options: > 1. submit patches for oxygen to support plasma 5 in a better way > 2. fork breeze and make new higs this doesn't mean that I want accept > patches to breeze but it would be better to have a fork and when the fork > work quite good, we can merge. > > I would be very happy if someone is interested into solution 1 or 2. Hi again. Yes , the header is totally right. Sorry for my opinion, but AFAIK one of the fundaments of the OSS is the user feedback. And people like you nowadays seems to totally not fit in this situation. Because some devs just does not read, does not listen and does not accept even the minimal offerings that are directly coming from the users. Screenshots, detailed explanations, some suggestions...What did you not understanding? And this cost our time too - because we have work to do on our machimes and we want to do it in the most effective way. I (as a reporter) agreed that KDE Design Team has a 'design' decisions for the 'flat' but someone hurried up to put 'WONTFIX' (maybe the favourite decision of the devs nowadays) even when the discussion is not done and users still have some things to say? On (2) - don't you think that you are offering people a 'double work'? Instead of just accept that something in breeze isn't right and go to decision for enhancement you speak about forking? This is not a decision at all - it does not solve any problems but 1: cost even more time to everyone; 2: will bring even more 'personal preferences' to the 'ring'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
