https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383421
--- Comment #29 from Nate Graham <pointedst...@zoho.com> --- The bottom line is that aesthetics are subjective, but usability isn't. It's possible for a "flat" design to have perfectly good usability if its UI elements give the proper visual cues: buttons are recognizably buttons, links follow the convention of being undermined, icons reasonably resemble the the concepts they represent, etc. As long as all that's done, the style is a matter of taste. If there are legitimate *usability* (as opposed to aesthetic) problems with Breeze, we should fix them. But "flat" doesn't automatically equal "bad"--and I say this as someone who prefers a bit more depth to his icons! Here is an example of a Breeze icon bug that's primarily about a usability issue rather than an aesthetic preference, even though aesthetics come into it: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384357 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
