rootArtifactId is interpreted incorrectly in maven-archetype-plugin:2.0-alpha-5 
(was okay in 2.0-alpha-4)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: ARCHETYPE-301
                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ARCHETYPE-301
             Project: Maven Archetype
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Generator
    Affects Versions: 2.0-alpha-5
         Environment: Mac OS X 10.6.3, Java 1.6.0_17, Maven 3.0-beta-1
            Reporter: Pat Podenski
            Priority: Critical
         Attachments: demo-archetype.zip

Apparently a modification was made to the maven-archetype-plugin in 2.0-alpha-5 
that has changed the way that rootArtifactId is interpreted. A similar issue 
has been reported, but with somewhat different symptoms (ARCHETYPE-298).

If you install the attached demo-archetype (multimodule) and then create a 
project from it, rootArtifactId will be interpreted differently between 
2.0-alpha-4 and 2.0-alpha-5. This demo-archetype uses the supplied artifactId 
(when creating a project) to 'derive' the desired parent and sub-module 
artifactIds with the following expressions in the respective archetype poms:

parent artifactId  ---- <artifactId>${artifactId}-parent</artifactId>

module artifactId  ---- <artifactId>${rootArtifactId}-module</artifactId>


Steps to reproduce this problem using demo-archetype:

1] unzip demo-archetype.zip and build it (mvn install) to install in 
~/.m2/repository.
2] Create a project from the demo-archetype using 2.0-alpha-4:
mvn org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-archetype-plugin:2.0-alpha-4:generate
3] Note that in the sub-module the parent artifactId is correct for the 
associated parent.
4] Then create a project from the demo-archetype using 2.0-alpha-5:
mvn org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-archetype-plugin:2.0-alpha-5:generate
5] Note that in this project sub-module the parent artifactId is NOT correct 
for the associated parent.

For example, for a project whose input artifactId = purchase-order, the 
following results are obtained for the parent/module artifactIds in the 
respective cases:

(A)** WITH 2.0-alpha-4 (correct results):
parent coordinates are [org.foo:purchase-order-parent:1.0-SNAPSHOT]
and
sub-module coordinates are [org.foo:purchase-order-module:1.0-SNAPSHOT]
- parent coordinates in sub-module are 
[org.foo:purchase-order-parent:1.0-SNAPSHOT]

(B)** WITH 2.0-alpha-5 (incorrect results):
parent coordinates are [org.foo:purchase-order-parent:1.0-SNAPSHOT]
and
sub-module coordinates are [org.foo:purchase-order-module:1.0-SNAPSHOT]
- parent coordinates in sub-module are [org.foo:purchase-order:1.0-SNAPSHOT]

In case (B) the '-parent' portion of the parent artifactId is missing. Instead 
of using the actual rootArtifactId (purchase-order-parent), the 'entered' 
artifactId is being used (purchase-order).

The second case (B) will not build because the parent artifactId in the 
sub-module is not correct for the respective parent.



-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to