[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17614756#comment-17614756
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on MRESOLVER-276:
------------------------------------------
michael-o commented on code in PR #200:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/pull/200#discussion_r990814613
##########
maven-resolver-impl/src/main/java/org/eclipse/aether/internal/impl/DefaultArtifactResolver.java:
##########
@@ -426,6 +442,14 @@ else if ( local.getFile() != null )
}
}
+ for ( ArtifactResolverPostProcessor artifactResolverPostProcessor :
artifactResolverPostProcessors.values() )
+ {
+ if ( artifactResolverPostProcessor.postProcess( session, results )
)
+ {
+ failures = true;
+ }
Review Comment:
Since all of them are processed, is it worthwhile to document that PP impls
shall not rely on any order and/or the result of a previous call?
> Resolver post-processor
> -----------------------
>
> Key: MRESOLVER-276
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-276
> Project: Maven Resolver
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Resolver
> Reporter: Tamas Cservenak
> Assignee: Tamas Cservenak
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: resolver-next
>
>
> Introduce new feature, resolver post-processor that is able to post process
> resolution results just before artifact resolver returns them to caller. Post
> processor should be able to signal resolution failure (along with errors)
> just like existing resolution may fail.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
