exclusion on dependency seems to act global on POM
--------------------------------------------------

         Key: MNG-2420
         URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2420
     Project: Maven 2
        Type: Bug

  Components: Dependencies  
    Versions: 2.0.4    
 Environment: tested on solaris, linux and windows
    Reporter: Jörg Hohwiller


In my POM I added "xerces:xercesImpl:2.8.0" as compile dependency what depends 
on "xml-apis:xml-apis:1.3.03".
Since I also have "commons-betwixt:commons-betwixt:0.7", 
"commons-configuration:commons-configuration:1.2", and "ant:ant:1.6.5" as 
dependencies that also depend on "xml-apis" but in different versions I came 
into trouble.
Since one of theses "xml-apis" dependencies has a higher version number (but is 
the JAR of an earlier version) maven does not decide for "1.3.03" which is 
correct behaviour for maven. Anyways I got
NoClassDefFoundError: org/w3c/dom/DOMError
when I run my tests with XmlUnit.

Now here comes the problem:
I added the following XML snipplet to all dependencies that depend on xml-apis 
except for xercesImpl.
 <exclusion>
  <artifactId>xml-apis</artifactId>
  <groupId>xml-apis</groupId>
</exclusion>

This caused maven NOT to include the dependency on "xml-apis" at all.

This was hard to track because the "org/w3c/dom/DOMError" did not occure on 
evey machine involved in the project.
I figured out that the ones having no trouble used jdk1.5 that has this code 
included inside (JAXP 1.3).
With jdk1.4.2 this bug was reproducable on any operating system.
Now it comes even harder:
I added
<dependency>
      <groupId>xml-apis</groupId>
      <artifactId>xml-apis</artifactId>
      <version>1.3.03</version>
</dependency>

as toplevel dependency to the POM and still maven did NOT include this 
dependency when running the test.
The funny thing is that "mvn eclipse:eclipse" produced the right dependency in 
my IDE.
Anyways in the dependency report on the site it was missing.

I additionally had to remove all the exclusion tags to make it work again.

To me it looks like the handling of the <exclusion> tag is broken, 
meaning that it does NOT work as I (!) expected.
I hope that this behaviour is NOT intendet.

Best Regards Jörg

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to