benwtrent commented on code in PR #15952:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/15952#discussion_r3073285224
##########
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/KnnVectorsWriter.java:
##########
@@ -96,18 +107,22 @@ public final void merge(MergeState mergeState) throws
IOException {
}
}
- for (FieldInfo fieldInfo : mergeState.mergeFieldInfos) {
- if (fieldInfo.hasVectorValues()) {
- if (mergeState.infoStream.isEnabled("VV")) {
- mergeState.infoStream.message("VV", "merging " +
mergeState.segmentInfo);
- }
+ try {
+ for (FieldInfo fieldInfo : mergeState.mergeFieldInfos) {
+ if (fieldInfo.hasVectorValues()) {
+ if (mergeState.infoStream.isEnabled("VV")) {
+ mergeState.infoStream.message("VV", "merging " +
mergeState.segmentInfo);
+ }
- mergeOneField(fieldInfo, mergeState);
+ mergeOneField(fieldInfo, mergeState);
- if (mergeState.infoStream.isEnabled("VV")) {
- mergeState.infoStream.message("VV", "merge done " +
mergeState.segmentInfo);
+ if (mergeState.infoStream.isEnabled("VV")) {
+ mergeState.infoStream.message("VV", "merge done " +
mergeState.segmentInfo);
+ }
}
}
+ } finally {
+ afterMerge();
}
finish();
Review Comment:
Why doesn't `finish` work? It seems like the writer should know its in a
merge context already and `finish` should just handle that? Adding a new
interface seems unnecessary?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
