heemin32 commented on PR #13525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13525#issuecomment-2902248141

   I believe this proposal to add a new field for multi-vector support is 
facing significant challenges primarily because we aim to support HNSW-based 
search on it. However, if our goal were limited to enabling MAXSIM scoring 
between two multi-vectors using only exact search (i.e., without KNN indexing 
for faster retrieval), many of these challenges could be avoided. This exact 
search approach would still be valuable for re-scoring documents after an 
initial KNN query retrieves a small candidate set.
   
   If we want to represent multi-vectors as an array of vectors within a single 
document—rather than relying on a parent-child document structure—it might make 
sense to integrate this into the existing field type. However, such an approach 
should clearly demonstrate a performance advantage to justify the change.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to