gf2121 commented on code in PR #14494:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14494#discussion_r2076752951
##########
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene103/blocktree/TrieReader.java:
##########
@@ -74,14 +77,39 @@ IndexInput floorData(TrieReader r) throws IOException {
final RandomAccessInput access;
final IndexInput input;
final Node root;
+ final int[] labelMap;
- TrieReader(IndexInput input, long rootFP) throws IOException {
+ static IOSupplier<TrieReader> readerSupplier(DataInput metaIn, IndexInput
indexIn)
+ throws IOException {
+ int[] labelMap = TrieReader.labelMap(metaIn);
+ long start = metaIn.readVLong();
+ long rootFP = metaIn.readVLong();
+ long end = metaIn.readVLong();
+ return () -> new TrieReader(indexIn.slice("outputs", start, end - start),
rootFP, labelMap);
+ }
+
+ private TrieReader(IndexInput input, long rootFP, int[] labelMap) throws
IOException {
this.access = input.randomAccessSlice(0, input.length());
+ this.labelMap = labelMap;
this.input = input;
this.root = new Node();
load(root, rootFP);
}
+ private static int[] labelMap(DataInput in) throws IOException {
+ int cnt = in.readVInt();
+ if (cnt == 0) {
+ return null;
+ } else {
+ int[] labelMap = new int[TrieBuilder.BYTE_RANGE];
Review Comment:
Thanks for the feedback @keikino , I agree that this does reduce memory, but
there is an extra `bitset#get` overhead for each child lookup. I'll see what
luceneutil will say.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
