benwtrent opened a new pull request, #14329: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14329
I have noticed some rare failures of this test, but every time it failed, it was due to a valid set of kNN docs being found before the exploration limit was actually hit. This is due to extremely lucky entry point selection, which is possible. So, I removed some of the randomness. I still like to have at least SOME randomness (e.g. the index being random, dims, etc.). This gives us some nice behavior coverage. If this keeps failing periodically (due to lucky entry points), maybe all randomness will need to be removed for this particular case. closes: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14266 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
