benwtrent commented on PR #14160:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14160#issuecomment-2631840332
> I think this 'correlation' is important to test as I imagine many real
world filters involve some correlation, rather than the random filters we get
in luceneutil benchmarks.
I agree, however, random is also generally useful for:
- Folks indexing multiple client data into the same graph (common for
hosted multi-tenant)
- Filtering by timestamp
- Any amount of deleted docs (deletes are "filters").
But, I eagerly await your results. I am going to refactor this assuming we
just always have it on at a given threshold (I am leaning towards 60% allowed
vectors or lower as being the threshold).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
