original-brownbear commented on PR #14156:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14156#issuecomment-2607056900
@jpountz
> was introduced had a benchmark that demonstrated an improvement with the
current logic
Huh those results are quite unexpected I must admit :) When me and Chris
reasoned about this, the idea was that `madvise` ("will need") over a range
that is fully cached would be the same cost as the `isLoaded` check. If that
assumption holds this PR would be a clear winner but it seems that benchmark
suggests otherwise?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
